Private Trust Companies: Who Decides When a Family's Trustee Is the Counterparty

The trustee is the counterparty

When a large family's capital shows up in a fund subscription, a co-investment or a managed account, the name on the signature block is often not the family office and not a family member. It is a trustee. For some substantial families in the United States, that trustee is a company the family formed for the purpose: a private trust company, or PTC.

The distinction matters. A family office is usually an investment and administrative platform; a PTC is a fiduciary. It holds legal title to trust assets, owes duties to beneficiaries, and acts through committees whose composition can be dictated by state statute and shaped by federal tax guidance. The same person may vote on a fund investment while being barred from voting on a distribution from the trust that holds it.

For advisers, fund managers and distribution teams, this raises a question that rarely gets asked directly: when a PTC is on the other side of the table, who actually decides? This analysis covers why families build their own trustee, how six US jurisdictions structure PTCs, how IRS Notice 2008-63 shaped PTC governance around estate-tax risk, and how federal reporting changed in 2025 and 2026, then turns to what this means for anyone selling to, advising or onboarding a family whose capital sits in trust.

---

Part I: Why families build their own trustee

The problem a PTC solves

A family with long-dated trusts traditionally had two choices of trustee. An individual, often a family member or trusted adviser, is flexible and close to the family, but individuals die, become incapacitated and carry personal liability, and a family-member trustee can create tax problems if he or she holds powers over a trust from which he or she can benefit. A commercial corporate trustee offers continuity and institutional process, but brings its own investment policies and fee schedules, and may be reluctant to hold concentrated positions, operating businesses or other assets that do not fit a standard template.

A PTC is the third path. The family forms a corporation or limited liability company whose business is to serve as trustee for the family's trusts. It has perpetual existence like a corporate trustee, but its board, officers and committees can include family members, long-standing advisers and independent professionals chosen by the family. Done properly, it lets the family keep influence over investment strategy and administration while building in the separations that trust law and tax law require.

What a PTC is not

A PTC is not a family office, although the two are often linked and may share staff and leadership. The family office typically employs the investment team and runs reporting and administration; the PTC is a narrow-purpose fiduciary whose job is to administer trusts. A PTC may delegate investment management to the family office, outside managers or an investment committee, while distribution decisions sit in a separate committee with its own membership rules.

A PTC is also not a public trust company. Every statute discussed below draws the same line: the PTC may serve the family and closely defined related persons, and it may not do trust business with the general public. Wyoming, for example, requires the organizational documents of a private family trust company to state that it will act as a fiduciary exclusively for one or more family members and will not engage in trust company business with the general public.

Regulated versus unregulated PTCs

The first design decision is whether the PTC will be chartered and supervised by a state banking regulator, or formed without a charter where state law permits.

Regulated (chartered or licensed) PTCs obtain authority from a state banking department, meet capital, bonding and insurance requirements, and are subject to examination. In exchange, they gain a regulatory status that counterparties and custodians can verify. Part II sets out the specific requirements by state.

Unregulated (private or unlicensed) PTCs are permitted in some states for families that want a corporate trustee without a charter. Nevada's statute provides that a family trust company is not required to be licensed as a trust company and, unless it applies for a license, is not subject to supervision by the Commissioner of Financial Institutions. Wyoming defines a private family trust company as one that is not chartered and is not subject to regulation by the Wyoming Division of Banking.

The trade-off is not only cost. A regulated PTC's status is verifiable and its operations are examined. An unregulated PTC can be faster and cheaper to establish, but relies more heavily on its own governing documents, so counterparties need to do more of their own diligence on authority and control.

---

Part II: The leading jurisdictions

This analysis compares six states: South Dakota, Wyoming, Nevada, New Hampshire, Delaware and Tennessee. Each combines a trust company statute with a broader trust code, and the second matters as much as the first: directed-trust and trust-protector rules, the perpetuities period that governs how long a dynasty trust can last, decanting authority, and privacy.

South Dakota

South Dakota regulates trust companies under SDCL chapter 51A-6A and charters private trust companies through its Division of Banking, which describes them as entities that limit activities to the management of private assets, usually for the benefit of a single family lineage. The statutory capital floor is 200,000 dollars, with the director empowered to require more, and the bond and D&O policy must each be at least 1 million dollars. The Division's published fee schedule sets an annual supervisory fee for private trust companies of between 3,750 dollars and 20,000 dollars.

SDCL 43-5-8 states that the common-law rule against perpetuities is not in force in the state. SDCL chapter 55-1B governs trust advisors and trust protectors: section 55-1B-6 lists protector powers that can include modifying the instrument for tax reasons, removing and appointing trustees, advisors and committee members, vetoing or directing distributions, and changing situs, while section 55-1B-2 relieves an excluded fiduciary from liability for losses that result from following a trust advisor's direction. SDCL 55-2-15 is the decanting statute, allowing a trustee with distribution discretion to appoint property to a second trust. On privacy, SDCL 21-22-28 provides that in court proceedings concerning a trust, the instrument, the court file and related filings are sealed upon filing and are not part of the public record.

Wyoming

Wyoming's 2019 House Bill 30, effective July 1, 2019, reorganized its trust company law into separate frameworks for public trust companies, chartered family trust companies and private family trust companies. Chartered family trust companies are examined at least once every three years and, as supervised trust companies, must pledge investments or post a surety bond of not less than 1 million dollars (W.S. 13-5-413), a requirement that does not apply to private family trust companies. Both forms may serve key employees of family-controlled entities.

Private family trust companies are formed by filing organizational documents with the Secretary of State and delivering a signed waiver to the banking commissioner acknowledging that the company is not supervised and will not transact business with the public. The statute allows the commissioner to inspect a private family trust company if there is reasonable cause to believe it has transacted, or proposes to transact, trust business with the public. Wyoming also restricts naming: a private family trust company that uses "trust company" in its name must specify that it is a "private single family trust company."

On trust law, Wyoming's 2019 House Bill 31 amended W.S. 34-1-139 so that a trust created after July 1, 2003 that holds property other than real property may continue for up to 1,000 years, subject to conditions including that the trust is governed by Wyoming law and the trustee maintains a place of business, administers the trust in Wyoming or is a Wyoming resident. Wyoming's directed-trust section, W.S. 4-10-718, treats a trustee that follows a protector's or advisor's direction as an excluded fiduciary for those duties, and a 2023 amendment allows a trust instrument to provide that protectors or advisors with power over distribution decisions are not acting in a fiduciary capacity, in which case the trustee is not treated as excluded for those decisions. W.S. 4-10-816(a)(xxviii) gives a trustee power to distribute income or principal in further trust for the beneficiaries.

Nevada

Nevada's NRS chapter 669A offers licensed and unlicensed family trust companies. NRS 669A.100 provides that a family trust company is not required to be licensed and, unless it applies for licensure, is not subject to the Commissioner's supervision. A licensed family trust company must be organized and operated with stockholders' equity of not less than 300,000 dollars, paid in cash.

Nevada's statutory rule against perpetuities, NRS 111.1031, validates a nonvested interest that vests or terminates within 365 years after its creation, as an alternative to the traditional lives-in-being-plus-21-years test. Nevada's directed-trust provisions limit the liability of a directed fiduciary for following a trust adviser's direction (NRS 163.5549), and NRS 163.5553 lists trust protector powers that can include removing and appointing trustees and investment or distribution committee members, directing or vetoing distributions, and changing situs or governing law. NRS 163.556 sets out when a trustee with discretion or authority to distribute income or principal may appoint trust property to a second, irrevocable trust.

New Hampshire

New Hampshire's RSA 383-D treats a family trust company as a state bank that is also a trust company, supervised by the banking commissioner. RSA 383-D:6-602 sets minimum required capital of 200,000 dollars and lets the commissioner require more. The commissioner may exempt a family trust company from various requirements, but RSA 383-D:7-702 lists items that cannot be waived, including the minimum capital requirement and the ban on taking deposits.

On perpetuities, New Hampshire takes an opt-out approach: RSA 564:24 provides that the common-law rule does not apply to a disposition created after its effective date (January 1, 2004) if the instrument expressly exempts itself from the rule and the trustee has power to sell, mortgage or lease property beyond the perpetuities period. The New Hampshire Trust Code addresses directed trusts (RSA 564-B:7-711) and makes trust advisors and protectors fiduciaries by default (RSA 564-B:12-1202), and RSA 564-B:4-418 gives trustees a power to decant.

Delaware

Before 2026, Delaware's trust company code offered a limited purpose trust company form (Title 5, chapter 7, subchapter V) but no dedicated family trust company charter. That changed with Senate Bill 327, signed by the governor on July 13, 2026 (85 Del. Laws ch. 346), which created a new Delaware-regulated "family trust company" serving a single family and its related trusts, entities and charities. The enacted text, now Title 5, chapter 7, subchapter IX, requires capital stock of 250,000 dollars plus paid-in surplus of not less than one-half of the minimum capital stock, a director, officer and employee dishonesty bond of at least 1 million dollars, a single Delaware office as its principal place of business, and at least one trust officer. The company may not advertise to the public or do trust business with non-family members.

Delaware's trust code supplies the rest. 25 Del. C. section 503 provides that no interest in personal property held in trust is void under any rule against perpetuities, while real property held in trust is subject to a 110-year rule. 12 Del. C. section 3313 treats advisers who direct, consent to or disapprove fiduciary decisions as fiduciaries unless the instrument provides otherwise, and shields a fiduciary that follows an adviser's direction from liability except for wilful misconduct (where the fiduciary acts only with an adviser's consent, gross negligence is also excepted), which the code defines as intentional wrongdoing, not mere negligence, gross negligence or recklessness. 12 Del. C. section 3528 authorizes a trustee with authority to invade principal or income to distribute into a second trust.

Tennessee

Tennessee regulates private trust companies under Tenn. Code Ann. section 45-2-2001 and following. A private trust company is one that does not transact trust business with the general public, and it must comply with the state's banking statutes unless the commissioner grants a written exemption, which may be granted in whole or in part on a finding that the company does not and will not serve the public. Tennessee's perpetuities statute, section 66-1-202(f), requires trusts created or made irrevocable after June 30, 2007 to provide that beneficial interests vest or terminate, or powers of appointment are exercised, within 360 years. Tennessee's trust code (section 35-15-1201) allows trust protectors and advisors to hold powers that include directing or consenting to investment decisions and distributions, removing and replacing trustees, and changing governing law, with those powers exercised in the holder's sole and absolute discretion.

Jurisdiction comparison

The table below includes only features verified against the statute or the regulator for each state. "Not covered here" does not mean the state lacks the feature; it means it was not verified for this analysis.

The statutes converge on structure: each confines the PTC to a defined family and bars public business. The differences that matter most to a counterparty usually sit in the trust code. Whether an investment direction comes from the trustee or a separately appointed adviser, and what liability standard applies to the trustee that follows it, depends on the directed-trust statute and the trust instrument.

---

Part III: The tax architecture of Notice 2008-63

Why the IRS cared

If a grantor or beneficiary controls the company that decides when and to whom trust assets are distributed, has that person retained, or been given, the kind of power that pulls trust assets into an estate or makes a gift incomplete?

On July 11, 2008, the IRS and Treasury released Notice 2008-63, published in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2008-31, which set out a proposed revenue ruling on the income, estate, gift and generation-skipping transfer tax consequences when family members create a PTC to serve as trustee of trusts having family members as grantors and beneficiaries. The agencies said the final ruling should confirm consequences no more restrictive than a taxpayer could achieve directly, without allowing a PTC to achieve results that acting directly could not. Comments were due November 4, 2008. ACTEC's contemporaneous commentary noted that the project had been on the Treasury-IRS Priority Guidance Plan since 2004-05 and that the IRS had withheld private letter rulings on the subject while it was pending.

The two situations

The proposed ruling analyzed a hypothetical family in two settings. In Situation 1, the PTC is formed in a state with a private trust company statute. In Situation 2, the PTC is formed in a state without one, and the same safeguards are written into the PTC's governing documents instead.

The safeguards are the heart of the proposal:

• A Discretionary Distribution Committee (DDC) holds exclusive authority over all discretionary distributions, defined as permissible distributions that are not mandated by the trust instrument or by law.
• Recusal by interest. No DDC member may participate in decisions for any trust of which that member or his or her spouse is a grantor or a beneficiary, or any trust with a beneficiary to whom the member or spouse owes a legal obligation of support.
• Personnel insulation. Only officers and managers of the PTC may participate in personnel decisions, including hiring, discharge, promotion and compensation.
• No reciprocal agreements. No family member may enter into any reciprocal agreement, express or implied, regarding discretionary distributions.
• An Amendment Committee (Situation 2 only). Because there is no statute to lock the rules in place, the governing documents create an Amendment Committee, a majority of whose members must be neither family members nor persons related or subordinate (within section 672(c)) to any shareholder. Only that committee can change the provisions on the DDC, the Amendment Committee itself, personnel authority and reciprocal agreements.

The conclusions

On those facts, the proposed ruling concluded that the PTC's appointment and service as trustee would not, by itself, cause trust assets to be included in a grantor's gross estate under sections 2036(a) or 2038(a); would not cause inclusion in a beneficiary's estate under section 2041; would not make the grantor's transfer an incomplete gift or treat distributions as gifts by DDC members; and would not affect a trust's GST-exempt status or inclusion ratio. For grantor trust purposes, it concluded that sections 673, 676, 677 and 678 would not apply solely because of PTC ownership or service, that section 675 is a question of fact to be determined on examination, and that section 674 depends on the trustee's powers and the share of related or subordinate DDC members, with ownership of PTC voting stock treated as not significant under section 672(c).

Two passages are especially relevant to anyone dealing with a PTC on investments. First, the proposed ruling stated that a beneficiary would not be treated as holding a general power of appointment solely because he or she is a shareholder or participates in the daily activities of the PTC, such as decisions regarding investments or the retention of attorneys, accountants or other advisers. The guidance thus contemplates family members involved in investment decisions but walled off from distribution decisions on trusts in which they have an interest. Second, the conclusions were expressly limited to the facts: if the statute in Situation 1 changed, or the Amendment Committee in Situation 2 changed the DDC provisions, the tax treatment could differ. The notice also requested comments on whether additional guidance was needed where trust assets include stock in a controlled corporation or life insurance.

Status

Notice 2008-63 was released as a proposed revenue ruling, and the agencies said they anticipated issuing a final ruling after considering comments. In researching this analysis we did not locate a final revenue ruling in the Internal Revenue Bulletin that supersedes the proposal, so the notice remains the published statement of the IRS's analysis. Current status is a question for tax counsel. For counterparties, the point is that the DDC model, recusal rules and amendment safeguards are the framework the IRS analyzed, which is why they may be reflected in a PTC's governing documents.

---

Part IV: Reporting and onboarding in 2025 and 2026

The Corporate Transparency Act, narrowed

The Corporate Transparency Act's beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting rule, published in September 2022 and effective January 1, 2024, originally required many US corporations and LLCs, subject to exemptions, which could have included PTCs and their holding entities, to report their beneficial owners to FinCEN. That regime has since been dismantled for domestic entities in two steps.

On March 2, 2025, Treasury announced that it would suspend CTA enforcement against US citizens and domestic companies. On March 21, 2025, FinCEN announced an interim final rule, published in the Federal Register on March 26, 2025, that redefined "reporting company" to cover only entities formed under foreign law and registered to do business in a US state or tribal jurisdiction, and exempted US persons from being reported.

On August 11, 2026, FinCEN issued a final rule making that change permanent. According to FinCEN, the final rule became effective on August 14, 2026, the date it was published in the Federal Register, and all entities created in the United States, including those previously known as domestic reporting companies, and their beneficial owners are exempt from BOI reporting. Law firm summaries of the final rule (Sidley, Mayer Brown) report that foreign reporting companies still must report non-US beneficial owners, that US persons holding a FinCEN ID no longer need to update their information, and that FinCEN will delete previously reported information about US persons from its BOI database. The Corporate Transparency Act itself has not been repealed; Mayer Brown describes the final rule as an exercise of statutory exemptive authority under the CTA and the Bank Secrecy Act.

For a PTC formed in a US state, the practical result is that there is no federal BOI filing obligation as of this writing. A family structure that includes non-US entities registered to do business in a US state should still be reviewed against the foreign reporting company rules.

Customer due diligence did not go away

The BOI rollback did not change the 2016 Customer Due Diligence (CDD) rule, which requires covered financial institutions to identify and verify the beneficial owners of legal entity customers. Under 31 CFR 1010.230, beneficial owners are each individual who owns 25 percent or more of the equity of a legal entity customer, plus a single individual with significant responsibility to control, manage or direct it. FinCEN has said it intends to revise the CDD rule in light of the narrowed reporting rule but has not set a timeline.

This is where the regulated-versus-unregulated choice becomes visible to counterparties. The CDD rule excludes from the definition of legal entity customer "a bank regulated by a State bank regulator," and FinCEN's definition of bank includes a commercial bank or trust company organized under the laws of any state. Whether a particular chartered PTC fits within that exclusion is a determination each institution makes under its own policies and counsel's advice. An unchartered PTC formed as an ordinary corporation or LLC will generally be onboarded like any other legal entity customer, with ownership and control persons identified.

The investment adviser question

A PTC that performs investment functions raises the question of SEC adviser registration. The SEC's family office rule, 17 CFR 275.202(a)(11)(G)-1, excludes from the definition of investment adviser a family office that has no clients other than family clients, is wholly owned by family clients and exclusively controlled by family members or family entities, and does not hold itself out to the public as an investment adviser. Family clients under the rule include key employees and specified trusts. Whether a given PTC relies on this exclusion or another basis is a question for the family's counsel; for a counterparty, it is a reason to ask which regulatory status the entity claims.

---

Part V: How the PTC and the family office fit together

Two committees, two kinds of decision

A PTC is easiest to understand by separating the two decisions a trustee makes.

Investment decisions concern what the trust owns. Depending on the structure, they are made by an investment committee of the PTC board, by the family office as adviser to the PTC, or, under a directed trust, by a named investment adviser whose directions the trustee must follow. Notice 2008-63 contemplated beneficiaries participating in investment decisions without, by that fact alone, holding a general power of appointment.

Distribution decisions concern who receives trust property and when. Under the Notice 2008-63 model, they sit with the DDC, whose members recuse where they have an interest. Because of the recusal rule, a DDC needs members who are not grantors or beneficiaries of the trust in question, which is one reason to include members from outside the family.

The two committees can overlap without being identical: a senior family member may chair the investment committee and be recused from most of the DDC's agenda.

The distribution policy

A PTC can adopt a written distribution policy setting out how the DDC applies the trust standards, what a beneficiary request must include, how other resources are considered and how decisions are minuted. The trust instrument still controls, but the policy creates a consistent record, which helps show that the recusal and anti-reciprocity rules operate as the governing documents say.

Illustrative example

The following is an illustrative example with an anonymous, hypothetical family.

The Ridgeline family has eight irrevocable trusts created by two generations and forms a PTC under a state family trust company statute. Its board includes two family members, the family office's chief investment officer and two outside directors. The board delegates investment authority to an investment committee composed of the CIO, one family member and one outside director, which engages the family office under an advisory agreement. Discretionary distributions are delegated to a DDC of three: one family member who is neither grantor nor beneficiary of four of the trusts, and the two outside directors. For the other four trusts, the family member recuses and the outside directors act alone.

When the PTC subscribes to a private credit fund for three of the trusts, the subscription is executed by the PTC as trustee, signed by an officer authorized by board resolution, and supported by a certification that the investment committee approved the investment. None of that paperwork involves the DDC. If a beneficiary later asks for a distribution funded from the fund's proceeds, that decision is the DDC's, not the investment committee's.

A manager that "knows the family" may still be talking to the wrong committee.

---

Part VI: Decision-making authority when a PTC is the counterparty

For advisers, fund managers and distribution teams, the implications reduce to questions to ask early.

1. Who is the legal counterparty? The investor of record is the PTC as trustee of a specific trust, not the PTC generally and not the family office. Each trust may need its own subscription, tax documentation and investor-eligibility analysis.

2. Where does investment authority sit? Ask whether investment decisions are made by the PTC's board, an investment committee, the family office under an advisory agreement, or a directed-trust investment adviser. Under directed-trust statutes such as Delaware's 12 Del. C. section 3313, Nevada's NRS 163.5549 or Wyoming's W.S. 4-10-718, a trustee that follows a direction may have limited liability for the outcome, and the real decision-maker may be the adviser named in the trust instrument rather than the trustee.

3. Who signs, and on what authority? Expect a certificate of incumbency or officer's certificate and the relevant board or committee resolution. For directed trusts, the direction letter from the investment adviser is part of the authority chain.

4. Is the PTC regulated? A chartered PTC can point to a state charter and examination history; an unchartered PTC relies on its organizational documents, so expect to review more of them. A Wyoming private family trust company has, by statute, delivered a waiver acknowledging it is not supervised.

5. Who is protected from what? Distribution decisions belong to the DDC under the Notice 2008-63 model, and the tax analysis depends on recusal rules actually being followed. An arrangement in which a family member who is a beneficiary informally steers distributions from his or her own trust, even indirectly through investment liquidity decisions, would sit outside the facts the notice analyzed.

6. Who can change the rules? Under the South Dakota, Nevada and Tennessee statutes, trust protectors and advisors can, depending on the instrument, hold powers to remove trustees, change situs or governing law, or direct or veto distributions. A relationship built with today's trustee can be moved by a protector tomorrow, so ask whether one exists and what powers it holds.

7. Which state's law governs the trust, not just the company? The trust instrument and its governing-law clause, not the PTC's state of formation alone, determine the perpetuities period, protector powers and directed-trust rules that bind the trustee. With domestic BOI reporting eliminated, these documents, plus the information collected under the CDD rule, are now the main sources for understanding a US-formed PTC.

---

The intelligence implication

The PTC is one of the clearest examples of why "the family office" is not a single decision-maker. Capital associated with one family can sit in several trusts, under one trustee, with investment authority delegated to one committee or adviser and distribution authority held by another body with different members. A distribution team that maps only the family office, the CIO and the principal will miss the officer who signs, the committee that approves, and the adviser named in a directed trust.

Building that map starts with public information. Some state banking regulators, such as South Dakota's Division of Banking, publish lists of the trust companies they license, and adviser registrations and Form ADV disclosures show which registered entities provide investment advice and to whom. Wealthmetrica's family office directory and RIA directory are designed to make that structure easier to see, and our data methodology explains how firm and contact records are sourced and maintained.

The practical lesson for anyone on the other side of the table is simple to state and harder to execute: before the pitch, find out which entity owns the capital, who holds the investment authority for that specific trust, and who can change the answer.

---

Key sources

• IRS, Notice 2008-63, Internal Revenue Bulletin 2008-31 (2008), proposed revenue ruling on private trust companies
• ACTEC Capital Letter No. 11, "Alternate Valuation and Private Trust Company Guidance" (2008)
• FinCEN, Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting page and final rule (August 2026); interim final rule (March 2025)
• Sidley Austin, "U.S. FinCEN Issues Final Rule Ending Beneficial Ownership Reporting Requirement" (2026); Mayer Brown, "The Final Chapter: FinCEN Permanently Eliminates BOI Reporting Requirements for US Companies and US Persons" (2026)
• 31 CFR 1010.230 (CDD rule) and 31 CFR 1010.100 (definitions)
• 17 CFR 275.202(a)(11)(G)-1 (SEC family office rule)
• South Dakota Codified Laws 51A-6A-19, 43-5-8, 55-1B-2, 55-1B-6, 55-2-15, 21-22-28; South Dakota Division of Banking, Trust Companies page
• Wyoming 2019 House Enrolled Act 14 (HB 30) and Enrolled Act 29 (HB 31); 2021 HB 104 and 2023 HB 101 (directed trusts); W.S. 4-10-816; McDermott Will and Emery, "Wyoming Updates Its Trust Company Legislation" (2019)
• Nevada Revised Statutes 669A.100, 669A.160, 111.1031, 163.5549, 163.5553, 163.556
• New Hampshire RSA 383-D:6-602, 383-D:7-702, 564:24, 564-B:7-711, 564-B:12-1202, 564-B:4-418
• Delaware Senate Bill 327 (153rd General Assembly, 2026); 5 Del. C. ch. 7 subchapters V and IX; 12 Del. C. 3313, 3528; 25 Del. C. 503
• Tennessee Code Annotated 45-2-2001, 66-1-202, 35-15-1201

Wealthmetrica provides intelligence on investment advisers, family offices and the people who run them. This analysis draws on public regulatory filings, statutes and published research; it is not legal, tax, or investment advice.